Welcome to Living Streets Edinburgh

Edinburgh, with its generally dense population and walkable distances, could be a European exemplar of a pedestrian-friendly city. But the many sensible walking-related policies of the City of Edinburgh Council too often don’t translate in practice into a safe and attractive walking environment on the streets. Motor traffic continues to dominate the vast majority of the city’s streets – yet there are clear economic, environmental and social benefits in prioritising pedestrian movement within a high-quality public realm.

Our overall aim is to:

Promote walking (including ‘wheeling’) as a safe, enjoyable, accessible and healthy way of getting around Edinburgh.

To this end, we want to see:

  • walking given the top priority over other forms of travel in all council transport and planning policies;
  • a reduction in the volume of motorised traffic and its impact on people using the street;
  • better designed and maintained pavements, road crossings and other pedestrian facilities;
  • more effective and joined-up monitoring and inspection of the walking environment by CEC;
  • planning policy which encourages dense, sustainable housing over car-dominated, dispersed development;
  • more effective implementation of pro-walking policies ‘on the ground’.

Our priorities for action in 2026 are to:

  • Campaign for increased budgets (capital and staffing) for the
    pedestrian environment by the City of Edinburgh Council, especially
    to:
    • widen footways;
    • tackle pavement clutter;
    • improve priority for pedestrians at signalled crossings;
    • improve accessibility by installing dropped kerbs and continuous
      footways.
  • Secure better enforcement of controls on parking (including new
    ‘pavement parking’ provisions) and speeding.
  • Support specific local campaigns for place-making and traffic
    reduction.
  • Develop our work on walk-friendly environments at and around
    schools.
  • Influence planning policy and practice to aid walking and wheeling
    and reduce motor traffic.
  • Influence Holyrood 2026 to support our four election asks (engine idling, zebra crossings, roadworks and speed cameras: https://bit.ly/4o5nTVd )
  • Grow the number of our supporters and range of our campaigns.

If you would like to get involved in our work in any way, please email us at:
 edinburghgroup@livingstreets.org.uk

 

Living Streets Edinburgh Group: Manifesto for 2027 Council elections

Maintain the position that “walking and wheeling are top of the sustainable travel hierarchy” and adhere to this hierarchy in every respect: street design, traffic management, budgets, maintenance, management of city streets.

Introduce an immediate increase in the pavement maintenance budget of £500,000 and commit to spending at least 25% of future roads maintenance budgets on footways.*

Review pedestrian waiting and crossing times at all traffic lights in the city and invest in smart signals to enhance efficient, sustainable mobility for everyone.

Respect pedestrian space by actively managing pavements to keep them clear of obstructions like roadworks signs, bins, hedges, old railings and other clutter.

Adopt a fresh approach to active travel programmes. Move away from  grand expensive schemes designed by consultants, and instead focus on smaller schemes, delivered in-house, which prioritise road safety, accessibility, travel to school and access to public transport.

Deliver a new City Mobility Plan/Transport Strategy based on practical, achievable measures to reduce traffic and encourage sustainable travel.

  • The annual footway maintenance budget is currently £3.500 million, which is 19% of the total roads budget of £18.467 million.

Deputation to Transport and Environment Committee, 12 November 2026 by the Living Streets Edinburgh Group

Item 7.8 Capital Investment Programme Annual Update: ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’

Living Streets Edinburgh Group is the local voluntary arm of the national charity campaigning for better conditions for everyday walking and wheeling.

We are asking TEC to approve funding for the ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ scheme as part of the review of capital priorities. This would make small-scale local improvements to streets – things like widening narrow pavements, fixing dropped kerbs and improving junctions – the kind of things which people across the city want to see.

TEC decided which active travel schemes should ‘proceed’ or pause’ last May. ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ ranked 71st in the evaluation matrix, just missing out on ‘proceeding’ by a single point, largely because it was ascribed an extremely high (but arbitrary) budget of £44 million. In our view, this would be the single most important of any active travel scheme in improving conditions for walking and wheeling in Edinburgh: much more so than many expensive, highly-engineered schemes which were ranked higher.

However at that meeting, TEC also agreed to receive an update on:

a) the equality and poverty impacts of the reprioritisation exercise and whether the prioritisation needs to be adjusted to better promote accessibility and poverty reduction

b) whether any larger projects (in excess of £10m) that have been paused could be split into smaller elements to allow some elements to be delivered.”

So we are disappointed that the report to TEC (Appendix 7) continues to recommend ‘pausing’ Liveable Neighbourhoods. This is hard to understand given that the whole rationale of the scheme is to split street improvements into manageable local packages. 

We understand that there are around 17,000 (!) missing or inadequate dropped kerbs in the city.  A City Mobility Plan KPI (#30) is to deliver 400 per year. But we’re told that the Council’s Active Travel team, which holds the central dropped kerb budget, delivered kerbs at only 8 sites in 2025/26 (we acknowledge that other teams, like road maintenance, will also have made improvements). A similar mismatch applies to pavements: hundreds of city pavements are less than the minimum acceptable width specified in both local and national guidance.

In the face of these challenges, the current rolling programmes cannot deliver the Council’s big ambitions for Edinburgh’s streets. Not for the first time, we also see a need to reiterate the agreed transport hierarchy – which has walking and wheeling at the top.

We therefore ask councillors to look again at ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ and to now approve a pared-down budget. This would potentially benefit residents in every ward and deliver many equality and poverty impacts that councillors want to see across the city.

November 2026

LSEG deputation on A-boards, September 2026

Deputation to Transport and Environment Committee, 10 September 2026 by the Living Streets Edinburgh Group

Item 7.3: Petition for Consideration – Make Edinburgh Tables and Chairs Charges Fair and Introduce Licensed A Boards for Local Businesses

Living Streets Edinburgh Group is the local voluntary arm of the national charity, Living Streets, which campaigns for better conditions for everyday walking and wheeling.

‘Pavement clutter’ is a significant problem on Edinburgh streets, with trade waste bins, roadworks debris and overhanging hedges among the many problems that pedestrians face on a daily basis. As so often, it is blind, older and less mobile pedestrians who are worst affected by obstructions encountered on the pavement. We regularly highlight these problems, for example: https://www.livingstreetsedinburgh.org.uk/2020/12/11/cut-the-pavement-clutter/.

We therefore strongly oppose the request in the petition that advertising ‘A-boards’ should once again be permitted, under licence, on city streets.  We played a leading role in persuading the Council to introduce the ban on A-boards and other temporary advertising structures in 2019. We urge councillors to maintain the ban, which the Council has by and large enforced well, adopting a consistent and fair approach for all businesses.

We agree with the petitioners that outdoor seating can bring life to streets and we have no objection to ‘tables and chairs’ on the pavement in principle. However it is essential that  they leave adequate space for pedestrians and follow Council’s guidance on their layout. This means effective management and where required enforcement by Council officers. We have no comment as to whether or not the level of fees charged for permits is reasonable.

David Hunter

Convener

August 2026

Council action against Trade Waste bins (FoI response)

Trade Waste

Thank you for your request for information of 03/04/2026 which  has been processed and considered under the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 (EIRs).  The information is provided below.

With regards to Trade Waste, please provide the following information for each of the three years 2023/24, 2024/25 and 2025/26:

How many penalty notices were issued for contravention of Right Time, Right Place policies?

What was the total of penalties issued?

What was the total of ££ collected (i.e. paid)?

No. of FPNs issuedFPN Overall TotalFPN payment Received
2023/2024123£9840£6080
2024/2025 *123£29800£16200
2025/202666£33,000£20,000

* The FPN amount was increased by the Scottish Government from £200 to £500 and implemented from November 2024.

Craigmillar Niddrie Connections: comments by Living Streets Edinburgh

‘Craigmillar Niddrie Connections’: comments by Living Streets Edinburgh

This is the formal response by Living Streets Edinburgh (LSEG), the local campaign for everyday walking and wheeling, to the current consultation on the ‘Craigmillar Niddrie Connections’ proposals: https://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/cycling-walking/craigmillar-niddrie-connections.

Our understanding of the proposals

It is often difficult to understand the most significant features of proposals like this from visualisations and drawings. From looking at the plans and from correspondence with council officers, we understand that key features are:

  • a continuous two-way cycleway from Prestonfield Avenue to Fort Kinnaird;
  • space for the cycleway on Peffermill Road to be taken from what is currently the carriageway;
  • space for the cycleway on Niddrie Mill Road Road to be taken from what is currently the northern footway;
  • the southern footway along the route will be largely unchanged;
  • a number of bus stops to be merged and all to have cycle bypasses (floating bus stops);
  • new bus lanes eastbound approaching the junction with Duddingston Road West and westward, for example from Hay Drive;
  • junction treatments to be altered to favour pedestrian movement (corner ‘tightening’,  continuous footways, etc) and more significant re-design to reduce motor traffic priority at key junctions like Greendykes Road and Craigmillar Castle Road;
  • public realm improvements and new paths, for example at Cairntows Park, Castleview school etc.

Overall concept

This project originated as a ’20 minute neighbourhood’ project:

“We want to revitalise the area around Niddrie Mains Road by creating better spaces for recreation and socialising alongside safe, high-quality walking, wheeling, and cycling routes. Our plans also include improving access and amenities around Cairntows Park.”

https://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/cycling-walking-projects-1/20-minute-neighbourhood-projects

Responses to the consultation broadly appear to have endorsed the followine objectives:

“When asked about what could improve the experience of spending time on the High Street, most comments were about maintenance, safety, environment, and amenities, such as:

  • Better care and maintenance of public realm around shopfronts, more bins, and upgraded street furniture.
  • More greenery, benches, better pavement, and less traffic.
  • More police presence to deter antisocial behaviour.
  • More local shops, family friendly cafes, pubs, and better leisure facilities.”

https://consultationhub.edinburgh.gov.uk/sfc/craigmillar/

We are therefore disappointed to see little emphasis on many of these issues. What was originally envisaged as a ‘placemaking’ exercise appears to have transformed into an ‘active travel scheme’ on a two mile long travel corridor from Prestonfield Avenue (or Cameron Toll as originally planned) to Kinnaird Park.

We understand that the Council’s 20 Minute Neighbourhood team has been disbanded; the reduced emphasis on ‘place’ is evident in these proposals which appear to prioritise the introduction of a continuous segregated cycleway. An emphasis on place would require not only changes to road design but also economic and social interventions, for example to enhance the commercial viability of local shops, tackle anti-social behaviour, etc.

Pavements

Craigmillar and Niddrie are unusual in that there are several extremely wide footways, as a result of major changes introduced before 2000. Normally, we would object in principle to conversion of pavements to other uses (road, cycleway, etc.) as being contrary to the sustainable travel hierarchy which puts pedestrian movement first. However, we accept that a lot of pavement space in the area is poor quality and in places excessive, adding little to the quality of the area, so consideration of alternative use of some space (e.g. for cycleways or bus lanes) could be justified.

Nevertheless, more new quality space with greenery should be integral to the scheme; as it stands, we understand that sections of the northern High Street pavement will be reduced to narrower than the ‘desirable’ 3 metre standard set out in the Edinburgh Street Design Guidance. Adequate pedestrian space should be the top priority in any scheme prioritising ‘place’ over ‘movement’.

Other comments

We welcome a number of specific features:

  • the junction treatments at side roads giving step-free access and emphasising pedestrian priority. However, many of these (King’s Haugh, Dunkirk Road, Hay Avenue, Blackchapel Close) do not promote the natural direction of travel for pedestrians and also deviate the cycleway.
  • the simplifying of the Duddingston Road West junction; we hope that pedestrian phasing of the signals is optimised.
  • the redevelopment of Cairntows Park, where street trees are proposed along the high street and the Castleview school proposals.

We suggest:

  • consideration is given to enhancing some of the uncontrolled pedestrian crossings over Niddrie Mill Road in particular by adding zebra crossings.
  •  extending the 20mph speed limit from Niddrie Mains Rd (where it currently ends) all the way to Fort Kinnaird.

We have concerns at:

  •  the closure/merger of several bus stops, which is likely to make it harder for people with limited mobility to use local bus services.
  • the routine installation of ‘floating’ bus stops; we receive regular feedback that these are a problem for older and disabled people, especially visually impaired. We consider that the description of these stops in the consultation is misleading (“creating a safe place for people to wait for the bus whilst also providing continuous safe cycling.”)

Conclusion

While there are certainly aspects of the proposals which would improve the Craigmillar/Niddrie area and its travel links, we would like to see the Council sponsor fewer big expensively-engineered active travel schemes like this. Instead, there should be greater emphasis on smaller, local schemes especially to enhance pedestrian spaces, neighbourhood shopping centres, schools, health centres, etc. These interventions would benefit more people at reduced public expense.

Living Streets Edinburgh

June 2026